International dis meaning tv#
Disney has said it has “proposed creative ways to make Disney’s direct-to-consumer services available to their Spectrum TV subscribers.” How has Disney responded?ĭisney fired back at Charter on Friday, blaming the cable company for refusing to enter a new agreement that “reflects market-based terms.” Disney also said in a statement that it had spent billions of dollars on its streaming services, which include Disney+ and ESPN+, and that Charter wanted to give them away to its subscribers free of charge. The company took the unusual step of scheduling an early-morning news conference on Friday to stake out its position, saying it tried and failed to persuade Disney to agree to a “transformative deal” that would combine traditional TV packages and subscriptions to streaming apps. How is this time different?Ĭharter is positioning the blackout of Disney’s channels, including ESPN, as a fight over the future of TV.
Until an agreement is reached, TV channels often go dark on cable and satellite TV providers for days or weeks at a time, frustrating viewers who believe they are not getting their money’s worth. Media companies like Disney generally want to charge more for their content, and cable providers like Charter are trying to minimize their costs at a time of declining subscribers.
How common are these disagreements?įights between cable companies and content providers happen all the time. Charter and Disney are two of the biggest players in the cable and TV industries, and they disagree over the best way to distribute movies and TV shows in an era when traditional viewership is eroding and streaming is on the rise.
But it could also have wider consequences. On its surface, the quarrel is about how much Disney can charge Charter for its content, and how much Charter’s customers will pay for access to Disney’s streaming apps.
0 kommentar(er)
